Since Jake and I are a bit anti-Valentine’s Day (not the sentiment… just the commercial aspect)we ended up making our plans the night before, long after 99.9% of Pittsburgh’s couples had booked their romantically overpriced candle-lit dinner reservations. As a result, we happily chose a late lunch date and an early movie. I had heard a lot of talk about “He’s Just Not That Into You” – I have several friends (to protect their identity we’ll call them “Janie, Kerryn, and Jilliann”) who have claimed this book a single woman’s manifesto – and I expected an easy going RomCom that took some comedic jabs at modern-day dating standards. Swept up in Val’s Day emotion, Jake miraculously agreed (normally, I have to create a three point thesis to sway the argument and win RENTING this type of movie).
Great actors + Great concept + Great book = Great Movie?
Not. So. Much.
I was so disappointed because I really wanted to like it, but I just could not get over how pathetic several of the characters came off. I literally felt AWKWARD in many of the scenes that were meant to be funny. Lets take a second and break down why these characters seemed like such sad sacks to me:
(Spoiler Alert: If you haven’t seen the movie and want to, DON’T READ.)
Exhibit A: Ginnifer Goodwin as the average girl. She is beautiful, kind-hearted, and successful… and yet she obsessively waits by the phone (stereotype, anyone?) and literally goes on stalker quests for guys she has met once. She ends up falling for a guy she originally said she was not attracted to only because she thinks he has fallen for her. She is wrong -- he brutally rejects her. Oh, no wait! She is right: he has a miraculous change of heart, throws his beloved bachelor lifestyle out the window, and they live happily ever after (or, at least we are led to believe so by how amazing they are playing Catchphrase/Taboo with their friends).
Exhibit B: Scarlet Johansson as the seductress. Flirts with and eventually falls for someone else’s “perfect husband.” At first he tries to resist, but her persistence to use his connections to further her career ultimately lead to major sexual tension (which, is normally present when a girl takes off her clothes in front of her male “friend”). Meanwhile, even though she has no interest in a relationship with him, she keeps another guy on the side (who legitimately loves her) for emotional affirmation. Later, Scar-Jo is in the middle of a
sexcapade with the married guy when his wife knocks on the office door. She has to hide in the closet and listen to him have sex with his wife --- she is
disgusted that he would do such a horrible thing [insert eye roll here] and breaks it off.
I think I’ll resist going off about the 3 other woman, but to sum them up:
Jennifer Aniston is with a man against the idea of marriage, but in the end -- surprise! -- they get married.
Drew Barrymore is a lovable romance misfit who finds love in her best friends ex (because its not weird AT ALL when your best friend has slept with your boyfriend). And,
Jennifer Connelly is married to the guy sleeping with Scar-Jo (which she blames herself for) and ends up divorcing him not for his affair, but for his smoking.
Now granted -- I get that I’m being critical here. I fully realize that the movie was trying to weave a complex web of relationships, play up stereotypes, and even throw in a few surprises. But, I can’t help but feel like the movie is a bit, dare I say it,
SEXIST. The women in this movie seem sad. And, the “guru” bartender (who ends up with Ginnifer Goodwin) is portrayed as intuitive and honest – and, yet, he speaks about the desperation/obsession of Ginnifer’s character as if is true for all women. This simply CANNOT be true for all single women.
Mentioning this to a friend at church (20-something, in a dating relationship), she came back at me swinging:
Friend: I loved that movie!
Me: Really? I just felt like it made women look so pathetic. I felt sad for those women!
Friend: Colleen, when was the last time you were even single?
Me: Um, I guess a pretty long time ago… I mean, Jake and I started dating when I was 18.
Friend:
Ok, well, there it is. We don’t all meet our husbands when we are 12 and never have to be out there. So, don’t try to pretend you know what its like.
Ouch. And, you know what, maybe she is right. I don’t like to be made to feel I have to APOLOGIZE for having “found” my husband when I was young… but, maybe I just assume that dating dynamics
aren’t that much different then when we were teens (which, admittedly, is flawed thinking). I may not be your average apron-wearing, “marriage is so wonderful”-proclaiming housewife… but, I have caught myself using “we” language from time to time (
ew.). Perhaps I have fully overlooked how much having a husband clouds my ability to think about the dating world for what it is. I am on the outside looking in, which (lets face it) is never a great place to get the most informed view. My naivety scares me because I worry it makes my advice to my single friends irrelevant. And, even though they are candid with me about their dating relationships, maybe there is no way for me to really understand what navigating the dating world is like for a single woman my age. And, (though
Im not happy about it) I get that.
But, my biggest fear is that my single friends buy into the lie that they have to play the game to score a husband. I hate the thought that they would believe they have to wait by that phone, go “run into him” to make things happen, try to be who he is looking for, or stay in a mediocre relationship because the risk of being alone is too great. Call me old-fashioned – but, I still believe that a strong, independent woman wins at the end of the day. And, that’s good news for “all my single ladies, all my single ladies.”
A girl can hope, right?